May 16th, 2020 
****This assignment utilizes Turnitin. This means that this assignment has two Drop boxes; one for submitting a paper to Turnitin as a draft and one for submitting the final version to the instructor for grading. Both submissions are required for this assignment. Since a draft is required, please allow yourself time to complete the draft, submit to Turnitin, and make any needed updates prior to submitting the final paper. Please see instructions for using Turnitin in the Course Overview module under Useful Resources.
Scenario:
The government has created a committee to investigate the potential of implanting a radio-frequency implantable device (RFID or commonly known as a chip) in every U.S. citizen OR on the use of the smart card (i.e. card that incorporates an individuals medical care record). In order to reduce the issues surrounding patient safety including patient identification, and maintenance of a complete and accurate history of disease processes and medications, this RFID or smart card will contain all of the individuals medical information.
When the patient arrives at a point-of-care, the RFID or the smart card is scanned, and all of the information is uploaded into the provider Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. Upon discharge, information is then downloaded back to the RFID or the smart card.
You have been invited as a nursing representative for your state to provide a report to the committee regarding the use of the RFID or the smart card. Choose one of these technologies and complete the following information to produce your report.
Introduction:
Create and introduction paragraph describing the topic (RFID or Smartcard), explain what will be addressed in the paper, and evaluate the pros and cons of using implantable devices or the Smartcard.
Create an introduction: Introduce the topic (RFID or Smartcard)
Body of the Paper:
Evaluate the Pros and Cons:
Analyze the pros and cons of the use of the implanted RFID or the Smartcard. To assist you in analysis, explore the US Food and Drug Administration Guidance Document (https://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/ElectromagneticCompatibilityEMC/ucm116647.htm (Links to an external site.) ) and investigate other sources on the internet or in the current literature. There are companies currently producing chips. Read marketing information found online for companies producing chips for additional background information.
Explain how you use smart devices in your personal life. How has this technology been incorporated in society?
Assess the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications:
What are the potential legal, ethical, and social implications, which should be considered if implementing and using RFID or the Smartcard if it is instituted, in your practice setting?
Identify populations who might greatly benefit from the use of the RFID or the Smartcard? (e.g. people with Alzheimers, children, those with cognitive disabilities, etc.).
Refer to the scenario above. How would the redundancy of information be addressed for the RFID or the Smartcard
Evaluate the Scenario and Discuss a Policy to Incorporate
Identify how your organization could incorporate the use of either of these technologies (RFIDs or other smart devices, such as Smart phone) in the practice setting?
Discuss the logistics. How would a healthcare provider access the information from the patients RFID or the Smartcard?
In thinking of the scenario above, identify the extent that patients can access their own information? Can the user access the exact same information as the healthcare provider?
What types of policies might be needed at your healthcare facility to safeguard patients who have an implanted RFID or the Smartcard?
Conclusion and Recommendation
Draft a conclusion statement which summarizes a possible recommendation for using RFID or Smartcard devices or explain why you feel further consideration of use is not warranted.
Formatting:
Grammar and APA Format
Present your analysis in a scholarly, 4-6 page, APA-formatted paper with the following elements:
Title Page (not included in page count)
Citations throughout
Introduction Catch the readers attention with interesting facts and supporting sources.
Body of analysis:
Present the pros and cons about the RFID or the smart card. Think globally and historically.
Identify the ethical, legal, and social implications of RFID or the Smartcard
Discuss policies to incorporate at your facility to safeguard patients with RFIDs or the Smartcard.
Conclusion and Recommendation Summarize the analysis and offer a recommendation. Is the RFID or the Smartcard a plausible method for the future of health care interoperability and portability of health information?
Reference Page (not included in page count)
Important note to students: Pay close attention not only to the details of this assignment but also to the spelling, grammar, and syntax of your work. You are encouraged to use your Galen resources such as Grammarly, APA Style Central, etc. to complete this assignment.
Rubric
RFID Smartcard Implantation APA Paper Rubric 2019
RFID Smartcard Implantation APA Paper Rubric 2019
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
5.0 pts
Excellent
Provides a thorough introduction paragraph which serves to introduce the choice of topic (RFID or Smartcard).
0.0 pts
Does not complete.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePros and cons about the RFID or the Smartcard.
5.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent and thorough assessment of the pros and cons of smartcard implantation.
4.0 pts
Satisfactory
Satisfactory assessment of the pros and cons of smartcard implantation.
3.0 pts
Fair
Fair assessment of the pros and cons of smartcard implantation.
2.0 pts
Inadequate
Inadequate assessment of the pros and cons of smartcard implantation.
1.0 pts
Substandard and unacceptable
Substandard and unacceptable assessment.
0.0 pts
Does not complete.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssess the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications for using the RFID or the Smartcard
5.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent articulation of ethical and legal issues regarding smartcard implantation.
4.0 pts
Satisfactory
Satisfactory articulation of ethical and legal issues regarding smartcard implantation.
3.0 pts
Fair
Fair articulation of ethical and legal issues regarding smartcard implantation.
2.0 pts
Inadequate
Inadequate articulation of ethical and legal issues regarding smartcard implantation.
1.0 pts
Substandard
Substandard and unacceptable articulation of ethical and legal issues regarding smartcard implantation.
0.0 pts
Does not complete.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate the Scenario and Discuss a Policy, or Policies, to Incorporate Related to the Use of RFIDs or Smartcards
5.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent, insight and articulation into the policies enforced at students current place of employment or other facility. Relates his/her own experience directly to the topic in a clear and concise manner.
4.0 pts
Satisfactory
Satisfactory insight and articulation into the policies enforced at students current place of employment or other facility. Discusses his/her experience and somewhat relates the experience to the topic in a clear and concise manner.
3.0 pts
Fair
Fair insight and articulation into the policies enforced at students current place of employment or other facility. Discusses some of his/her experience but is somewhat unclear about how it relates to the topic.
2.0 pts
Inadequate
Inadequate insight and articulation into the policies enforced at students current place of employment or other facility. Discusses very little of his/her experience but does not directly relate it to the topic in a clear manner.
1.0 pts
Substandard
Substandard insight and articulation into the policies enforced at students current place of employment or other facility. Fails to explain how his/her experience directly relates it to the topic.
0.0 pts
Does not complete.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Recommendation
5.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent conclusion of the topic with clear, thorough and well written and recommendation. Summarizes analysis to a high level.
4.0 pts
Satisfactory
Satisfactory conclusion of the topic with clear and well written recommendations properly summarized from analysis.
3.0 pts
Fair
Fair conclusion of the topic that is somewhat unclear in structure. Summarization of the analysis is not directly addressed in the recommendations.
2.0 pts
Inadequate
Inadequate conclusion of the topic that is unclear and lacking structure. Fails to summarize the analysis in recommendation and/or is unclear about recommendations.
1.0 pts
Substandard
Substandard conclusion lacking in content, unorganized or unstructured. Offers unclear recommendations that are not properly drawn from analysis.
0.0 pts
Does not complete.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and APA Formatting
5.0 pts
Excellent
APA Paper in proper format, complete with title page, introductory paragraph, conclusion paragraph, headings, formatting and reference page, within 4-6-page limit. Excellent use of grammar with proper formatting. Presentation has been proof-read and free of errors.
4.0 pts
Satisfactory
APA Paper with a rare minor APA formatting error, but with title page, introductory paragraph, conclusion paragraph, headings, formatting and reference page and is within 4-6-page limit. Satisfactory use of grammar with proper formatting. Presentation contains minor errors.
3.0 pts
Fair
APA Paper with a few APA formatting errors with title page, introductory paragraph, conclusion paragraph, headings, formatting and reference page, or outside 4-6-page expectation. Fair use of grammar with proper formatting. Presentation contains some errors in grammar and contains minor spelling errors.
1.0 pts
Inadequate
Many APA errors, missing many aspects of APA paper with title page, introductory paragraph, conclusion paragraph, headings, formatting and reference page and is outside 4-6-page expectation. Inadequate use of grammar with proper formatting. Presentation contains obvious errors in grammar and spelling.
0.0 pts
Not written in APA Format
0.0 pts
Substandard and unacceptable
Substandard and unacceptable APA Paper. Lacks attention to most if not all APA formatting with title page, introductory paragraph, conclusion paragraph, headings, formatting and reference page, and is outside 4-6-page expectation. Substandard and unacceptable use of grammar with no proper formatting. Presentation was clearly not proofed for grammar or spelling.
5.0
Posted in 